Interpretasi Simbolik Pada Tradisi Bubakan Dalam Relasi Hukum Islam Dan Budaya Lokal Perspektif Clifford Geertz
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21154/jelhum.v4i2.5264Abstract
The Bubakan tradition is one of the ceremonial sequences in Javanese wedding rituals, rich in symbolic elements and philosophical meaning, particularly as a form of purification and preparation intended to open the life path of the bride and groom so they may avoid obstacles and receive blessings. This study aims to uncover the symbolic meanings embedded in each element of the Bubakan tradition and to understand its role in reinforcing the social, spiritual, and cultural values of Javanese society. This research is a field study employing a qualitative–ethnographic approach. Data were collected through participant observation and in-depth interviews with traditional leaders, ritual practitioners, and community members involved in the ceremony. The study was conducted within Javanese communities that continue to preserve the Bubakan tradition. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive and analytical techniques with an inductive reasoning pattern and verification. The analysis adopts Clifford Geertz’s anthropological perspective, which views culture as a system of meanings expressed through symbols. The findings show that each element of the Bubakan tradition—such as the tumpeng, white cloth, offerings, and ritual movements—possesses profound symbolic significance representing blessings, hopes for a harmonious new life, purity of intention, and familial unity. The tradition also reflects Javanese cultural philosophy, emphasizing balance, harmony, and spirituality. The study concludes that the Bubakan tradition is not merely a ceremonial ritual but a symbolic representation of Javanese cultural values that continue to endure and remain meaningful within contemporary artistic practice.
References
Amady, Rawa - El. “Etik Dan Emik Pada Karya Etnografi.” Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya 16, no. 2 (2015): 167. https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v16i2.24.
Appleby, Joyce, Elizabeth Covington, David Hoyt, Michael Latham, and Allison Sneider.
“Clifford Geertz (1973): Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture.”
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315022086-50.
Basuki, Kustiadi. “Interpretasi Budaya Clifford Geertz: Agama Sebagai Sistem Budaya.” Jurnal Online Internasional & Nasional 53, no. 9 (2019): 1689–99. www.journal.uta45jakarta.ac.id.
Cai, Hua.
“The Predicament of Social Sciences in the 20th Century: A Dialogue with Clifford Geertz’s Essay ‘Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture’ (Part I).” International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41257-023-00102-2.
Ignas Kleden. “Dari Etnografi Ke Etnografi Tentang Etnografi: Antropologi Clifford Geertz Dalam Tiga Tahap.” BerandaNegeri.com, 2024. https://www.berandanegeri.com/2022/02/5362/dari-etnografi-ke-etnografi-tentang-etnografi-antropologi-clifford-geertz-dalam-tiga-tahap.php.
Mohamad Ramli, Yusri. “Agama Dalam Tentukur Antropologi Simbolik Clifford Geertz.” International Journal of Islamic Thought 1, no. 1 (2012): 62–73. https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.01.2012.008.
Ningrum, Vena Zulinda. “Kebudayaan Sebagai Sistem Kognitif Dan Kebudayaan Sebagai Sistem Simbolik.” Sosial Ant, 2017. https://blog.unnes.ac.id/venazulindaningrum01/2017/09/25/kebudayaan-sebagai-sistem-kognitif-dan-kebudayaan-sebagai-sistem-simbolik/.
Prasetya, Ari Budi. “SEMIOTIK : Simbol, Tanda, Dan Konstruksi Makna.” Universitas Brawijaya, 2014. http://arifbudi.lecture.ub.ac.id/2014/03/semiotik-simbol-tanda-dan-konstruksi-makna/.
Riady, Ahmad Sugeng. “Agama Dan Kebudayaan Masyarakat Perspektif Clifford Geertz.” Jurnal Sosiologi Agama Indonesia (JSAI) 2, no. 1 (2021): 13–22. https://doi.org/10.22373/jsai.v2i1.1199.
Sodiman. “Mengkaji Islam Empirik; Model Studi Hermeneutika Antropologis Clifford Geertz.” Zawiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam 4, no. 1 (2018): 23–40. https://ejournal.iainkendari.ac.id/zawiyah/article/view/993.
Syarifah, and Mushthoza.
“Antropologi Interpretatif Clifford Geertz: Studi Kasus Keagamaan Masyarakat Bali dan Maroko (Kajian Interpretatif Simbolik Clifford Geertz).” Sapala 5 (1): 1–10.
Syakhrani, Abdul Wahab, and Muhammad Luthfi Kamil.
“Budaya dan Kebudayaan: Tinjauan dari Berbagai Pakar, Wujud-Wujud Kebudayaan, 7 Unsur Kebudayaan yang Bersifat Universal.” Journal Form of Culture 5 (1): 1–10.
Weismann, Ivan Th. J.
“Simbolisme Menurut Mircea Eliade.” Jurnal Jaffray 2 (1): 54.



